Urban mining is the process of reclaiming compounds and elements from any kind of anthropogenic stocks, inlcuding buildings, infrastructure, industries, products (in and out of use) and environmental media receiving anthropogenic emissions (Cossu and Williams, 2015). Examples include, but are not limited to e-waste, municiple waste, construction waste and tyres. The stocks of these materials may represent an important resource, with the concentration of some elements generally being comparable to, or even exceeding natural ores (Cossu and Williams, 2015). For example, the average gold content of EEE waste is almost 130 ppm, compared to an average of 1 ppm in natural ores, the same is true for silver (1,000 ppm in EEE versus 215 ppm in ores) and palladium (52 ppm in EEE versus 3 ppm in ores) (Tesfaye et al., 2017).

Future potential

There is significant potential to recover metals from e-waste, especially from consumer electronics such as mobile phones. These products often contain a raft of precious (Au, Ag, Pd), base (Cu, Zn) and critical (In, REE, Li, Co) metals. Figure 1 shows the average content of Co, Cu, Pd, Ag and Au in the global mobile phone stock in 2020 (c. 5.2 billion units) compared to mine production, with some of the metal volumes not being insignificant e.g. contained Pd is about 200 tonnes, or almost one quater (24%) of global mine production.

Although the potential to recover valuable metals from e-waste is significant there are challenges that must be overcome related to effective collection, separation and processing. The collection of e-waste is a signifcant barrier to recycling that will require government policy intervention and public education to fix (Tesfaye et al., 2017). There are technical challenges related to processing, as e-waste constitutes an increadibly diverse feedstock with varying product designs that have variable metal contents. This can make processing difficult. One possible route for processing is pyrometallurgy, this high-temperature process copes well with varied feedstocks; however, volatile metals such as In, Ga and Li are likely to be lost to the waste stream (i.e. slags). Hydrometallurgy is another option for processing e-waste, it is more selective and can be engineered to capture most metals; however, it can be expensive and time consuming to install compared to pyrometallurgical methods. Irrespective of the route chosen, both require careful environmental management.

Figure 1  Average content of Co, Cu, Pd, Au and Ag in the global mobile phone stock in 2020 (c. 5.2 billion units) compared to mine production in the same year. Mine production data from BGS World Mineral Production. Metal content figures used to calculate content taken from Hagelüken (2012).

Further reading

Cossu and Williams (2015). Urban mining: concepts, terminology, challenges. Waste Management 45, 1-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.040

Tesfaye et al. (2017). Improving urban mining practices for optimal recovery of resources from e-waste. Minerals Engineering 111, 209-221 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2017.06.018

EU Urban Mine Platform

Contact

For questions regarding the project please contact Dr Evi Petavratzi.